Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists
Volume 11, Issue 2 , Pages 162-166, May 2004

Laparoscopic Excision of Adnexal Masses

    Dr.
  • Riccardo Marana, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author Riccardo Marana, M.D., Via Cassia 591, 00189 Rome, Italy
  • , Dr.
  • Ludovico Muzii, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Università Campus Biomedico, Rome, Italy
  • , Dr.
  • Giovan Fiore Catalano, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ospedale G.B. Grassi, Ostia, Rome, Italy
  • , Dr.
  • Paul Caruana, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
  • , Dr.
  • Cosimo Oliva, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ospedale G.B. Grassi, Ostia, Rome, Italy
  • , Dr.
  • Elisabetta Marana, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesiology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy

Received 5 August 2003; accepted 14 January 2004.

Abstract 

Study Objective

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate a prospective series of consecutive patients with adnexal masses selected with strict preoperative clinical and ultrasonographic criteria.

Design

Prospective series of consecutive patients (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).

Setting

Tertiary care university hospitals.

Patients

Six hundred and eighty-three consecutive patients under 40 years of age with ultrasonographic evidence of an adnexal cystic mass without thick septa, internal wall papillation, or solid components, except for sonographic pattern suggestive of dermoid.

Interventions

Operative laparoscopy and follow-up.

Measurements and Main Results

After initial diagnostic laparoscopy in 13 patients with stage 4 endometriosis and extensive bowel adhesions, in 2 patients with large-volume dermoids, and in 1 patient with suspect ovarian and peritoneal implants, the procedure was converted to laparotomy. Therefore, 667 patients were completely managed by laparoscopy. There were 1069 cysts excised. Histologic diagnosis was endometrioma in 57% of the excised cysts, serous cyst in 13%, dermoid in 12%, paratubal in 8%, mucinous cysts in 5.3%, functional cyst in 2.8%, other benign histotypes in 1.1%, and ovarian malignancies (seven borderline tumors and one endometrioma with a microfocus of G1 endometrioid carcinoma) in 0.7% of the cysts and 1.2% of the patients. These last patients are alive with no evidence of disease after a mean follow-up of 62 months.

Conclusions

In the present series, with accurate preoperative and intraoperative selection, the rate of unexpected borderline or focally invasive malignancies was 1.2% of the patients, and the laparoscopic management of these adnexal masses did not adversely impact on prognosis.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Presented at the 32nd annual meeting of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, Las Vegas, Nevada, November 19–22, 2003.

PII: S1074-3804(05)60191-0

doi:10.1016/S1074-3804(05)60191-0

Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists
Volume 11, Issue 2 , Pages 162-166, May 2004