Journal Home
Search for

Volume 58, Issue 5, Pages 417-423 (1 September 2005)


View previous. 14 of 16 View next.

Pituitary Volume Predicts Future Transition to Psychosis in Individuals at Ultra-High Risk of Developing Psychosis

Belinda Garnerae, Carmine M. PariantebCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Stephen J. Wooda, Dennis Velakoulisa, Lisa Phillipscd, Bridget Soulsbya, Warrick J. Brewerc, Deidre J. Smithc, Paola Dazzanb, Gregor E. Bergercd, Alison R. Yungcd, Maarten van den Buusee, Robin Murrayb, Patrick D. McGorrycd, Christos Pantelisa

Received 16 December 2004; received in revised form 21 March 2005; accepted 11 April 2005. published online 18 July 2005.

Background

We examined pituitary volume before the onset of psychosis in subjects who were at ultra-high risk (UHR) for developing psychosis.

Methods

Pituitary volume was measured on 1.5-mm, coronal, 1.5-T magnetic resonance images in 94 UHR subjects recruited from admissions to the Personal Assessment and Crisis Evaluation Clinic in Melbourne, Australia and in 49 healthy control subjects. The UHR subjects were scanned at baseline and were followed clinically for a minimum of 1 year to detect transition to psychosis.

Results

Within the UHR group, a larger baseline pituitary volume was a significant predictor of future transition to psychosis. The UHR subjects who later went on to develop psychosis (UHR-P, n = 31) had a significantly larger (+12%; p = .001) baseline pituitary volume compared with UHR subjects who did not go on to develop psychosis (UHR-NP, n = 63). The survival analysis conducted by Cox regression showed that the risk of developing psychosis during the follow-up increased by 20% for every 10% increase in baseline pituitary volume (p = .002). Baseline pituitary volume of the UHR-NP subjects was smaller not only compared with UHR-P (as described above) but also compared with control subjects (−6%; p = .032).

Conclusions

The phase before the onset of psychosis is associated with a larger pituitary volume, suggesting activation of the HPA axis.

a Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Sunshine Hospital and National Neuroscience Facility, Melbourne, Australia

b Division of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom

c Orygen Research Centre, Melbourne

d Personal Assessment and Crisis Evaluation Clinic and Department of Psychiatry University of Melbourne

e Mental Health Research Institute of Victoria, Melbourne, Australia

Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Carmine M. Pariante, M.D., M.R.C.Psych., Ph.D., King’s College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Division of Psychological Medicine, Section of Clinical Neuropharmacology PO51, Stress, Psychiatry and Immunology Laboratory, 1 Windsor Walk, Denmark Hill, London SE5 8AF, United Kingdom

PII: S0006-3223(05)00478-6

doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.04.018


View previous. 14 of 16 View next.