Journal Home
Search for

Volume 67, Issue 1, Pages 52-58 (1 January 2010)


View previous. 13 of 25 View next.

Increased Volume of the Striatum in Psychopathic Individuals

Andrea L. GlennaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Adrian Raineb, Pauline S. Yaralianc, Yaling Yangd

Received 23 March 2009; received in revised form 11 June 2009; accepted 30 June 2009. published online 17 August 2009.

Background

The corpus striatum, comprised of the caudate, putamen, and globus pallidus, plays an important role in reward processing and may be involved in the pathophysiology of antisocial behavior. Few studies have explored whether differences are present in the striatum of antisocial individuals. Here, we examine the structure of the striatum in relation to psychopathy.

Methods

Using a case-control design, we examined the volume of the striatum in psychopathic individuals compared with control subjects matched for age, sex, ethnicity, and substance dependence. Twenty-two psychopathic individuals assessed using the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised and 22 comparison subjects underwent structural magnetic resonance imaging. Volumes of the left and right lenticular nucleus (putamen and globus pallidus), caudate head, and caudate body were assessed and the psychopathic and control groups were compared.

Results

Psychopathic individuals showed a 9.6% increase in striatum volumes. Analyses of subfactors of psychopathy revealed that caudate body volumes were primarily associated with the interpersonal and affective features of psychopathy, while caudate head volumes were primarily associated with the impulsive, stimulation-seeking features.

Conclusions

These findings provide new evidence for differences in the striatum of psychopathic individuals. This structural difference may partially underlie the reward-seeking and decision-making deficits associated with psychopathy.

a Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

b Department of Criminology, Psychiatry and Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

c Neuroscience Associates Inc., Los Angeles, California

d Department of Neurology, University of California, Los Angeles, California

Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to Andrea L. Glenn, M.A., University of Pennsylvania, Department of Psychology, 3720 Walnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104

PII: S0006-3223(09)00788-4

doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.06.018


View previous. 13 of 25 View next.