Journal Home
Search for

Volume 30, Issue 6, Pages 381-386 (June 2008)


View previous. 2 of 16 View next.

Diagnosis of congenital hydrocephalus and delivery of its patients in Japan

Kouzo MoritakeaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Hidemasa Nagaia, Noriko Nagasakoa, Mami Yamasakib, Shizuo Oic, Toshiyuki Hatad

Received 14 September 2007; received in revised form 6 November 2007; accepted 8 November 2007.

Abstract 

The study population included 193 patients with prenatally diagnosed (fetal) hydrocephalus and 181 with postnatally (12 or less than 12 months after birth) diagnosed (infantile) hydrocephalus identified by a nationwide questionnaire survey of congenital hydrocephalus performed in 2000. Of 180 patients with fetal, 101 (56.1%) were diagnosed before week 32 of gestation and 18 (10%) were diagnosed week 37 and later of gestation. In patients with fetal hydrocephalus, US was used in more than 80% of the cases, whereas in patients with infantile hydrocephalus, CT was used in more than half of the cases. For diagnosis of fetal hydrocephalus, either US or MRI had become dominantly utilized and CT had gone out of use in 1996–2000. The adoption ratio of cesarean delivery to transvaginal delivery was around 7 to 3 in patients with fetal hydrocephalus, and 2 to 7 in patients with infantile hydrocephalus, respectively, with significant difference between fetal hydrocephalus and infantile hydrocephalus groups (p<0.001). Clinical outcomes in patients with fetal hydrocephalus was better in those delivered transvaginally than in those by cesarean delivery, although without no statistical significance (p=0.124) and those in patients with infantile hydrocephalus showed almost no difference between transvaginal and cesarean delivery groups. There was a tendency for the Apgar score at 5min to be lower in smaller birth weight infants with a body weight of less than 2000g. This score could be useful as an index for predicting immediate postnatal death in patients with fetal hydrocephalus.

a Department of Neurosurgery, Shimane University School of Medicine, 89-1 Enya-cho, Izumo, Shimane 693-8501, Japan

b Department of Neurosurgery and Clinical Institute, Osaka National Hospital, National Hospital Organization, Osaka, Japan

c Department of Neurosurgery, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

d Department of Perinatology and Gynecology, Kagawa University School of Medicine, Kagawa, Japan

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +81 853 20 2245; fax: +81 853 21 8954.

PII: S0387-7604(07)00245-8

doi:10.1016/j.braindev.2007.11.002


View previous. 2 of 16 View next.