European Journal of Cancer
Volume 42, Issue 12 , Pages 1780-1788, August 2006

CMF versus goserelin as adjuvant therapy for node-negative, hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer in premenopausal patients: A randomised trial (GABG trial IV-A-93)

  • Gunter von Minckwitz

      Affiliations

    • German Breast Group, Schleussnerstrase 42, 63263 Neu-Isenburg, Germany
    • Universitäts-Frauenklinik, Frankfurt, Germany
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: Tel.: +49 6102 798740; fax: +49 6102 7987440.
  • ,
  • Erika Graf

      Affiliations

    • Medizinische Biometrie und Statistik, Universitätsklinikum, Freiburg, Germany
  • ,
  • Matthias Geberth

      Affiliations

    • Universitäts-Frauenklinik, Heidelberg, Germany
  • ,
  • Wolfgang Eiermann

      Affiliations

    • Rot-Kreuz-Krankenhaus, München, Germany
  • ,
  • Walter Jonat

      Affiliations

    • Universitäts-Frauenklinik, Kiel, Germany
  • ,
  • Bettina Conrad

      Affiliations

    • Senologisches Zentrum, Kassel, Germany
  • ,
  • Klaus Brunnert

      Affiliations

    • Klinik für Senologie, Osnabrück, Germany
  • ,
  • Bernd Gerber

      Affiliations

    • Universitäts-Frauenklinik, München rechts der Isar, Germany
  • ,
  • Sabine Vescia

      Affiliations

    • City Hospital, Hanau, Germany
  • ,
  • Jörg Wollert

      Affiliations

    • AstraZeneca Deutschland GmbH, Wedel, Germany
  • ,
  • Manfred Kaufmann

      Affiliations

    • Universitäts-Frauenklinik, Frankfurt, Germany

Received 10 November 2005; received in revised form 10 April 2006; accepted 19 April 2006.

Abstract 

Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues were investigated as adjuvant treatment for patients with node-negative, hormone-sensitive, premenopausal breast cancer. Patients were randomised to either three cycles of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) chemotherapy (n=378) or goserelin every 28d for 2years (n=393). During a median follow-up of 4.9 years, 123 events were observed. The first-failure event of CMF versus goserelin, respectively, was ipsilateral locoregional recurrence (18 versus 20), contralateral breast cancer (7 versus 6), distant failure (35 versus 24) and death without recurrence (2 versus 2). Forty-two (23 versus 19) deaths of any cause occurred. The estimated adjusted hazard ratio for goserelin versus CMF (intention-to-treat analysis) was 0.79 (95% CI=0.54–1.14; P=0.19). It is concluded that medical ovarian ablation with goserelin represents a valid option for premenopausal patients with node-negative breast cancer.

Keywords: Breast cancer, Node-negative, Premenopausal, Ovarian ablation, GnRH, Goserelin, CMF, Chemotherapy

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0959-8049(06)00340-6

doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2006.04.006

European Journal of Cancer
Volume 42, Issue 12 , Pages 1780-1788, August 2006