Ethology and Sociobiology
Volume 17, Issue 6 , Pages 363-377, November 1996

Marriage as a reproductive contract: Patterns of marriage, divorce, and remarriage

State University of New York at Albany, Albany, New York USA

Received 25 April 1995; received in revised form 6 March 1996

Abstract 

Patterns of marriage, divorce, remarriage, and redivorce were examined in several representative Western cultures through survey questions and archival data to test the hypothesis that marriage and divorce can be understood as expressions of underlying gender-specific, fitness maximization strategies. Differences between males and females were found for the relationship between age and patterns of both marriage and divorce, with females being far more likely at almost all ages to initiate divorce proceedings than males. Once divorced, however, formerly married females were less likely to remarry than formerly married males. The presence of children from a prior marriage had the effect of further decreasing the likelihood of remarriage for females, but not for males. Formerly married males without children tended to remarry females who had never been married, whereas just the opposite was true for divorced males with children. Consistent with our view of marriage as a reproductive contract, the absence of children was not only conducive to divorce and remarriage, but appeared to increase the likelihood of redivorce as well.

Keywords:  Marriage, Divorce, Hypergamy, Reproduction, Remarriage, Sex differences

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0162-3095(96)00075-1

doi:10.1016/S0162-3095(96)00075-1

Ethology and Sociobiology
Volume 17, Issue 6 , Pages 363-377, November 1996