Ethology and Sociobiology
Volume 17, Issue 6 , Pages 403-416, November 1996

Social norm compliance as a signaling system. I. Studies of fitness-related attributions consequent on everyday norm violations

  • Brant Wenegrat

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests and correspondence to: Brant Wenegrat, Department of Psychiatry, Stanford University, 401 Quarry Road, Stanford, CA 94305, U.S.A.
    • Department of Veterans Affairs, Palo Alto, California, USA
    • Department of Psychiatry, Stanford University, Stanford, California USA
  • ,
  • Lisa Abrams

      Affiliations

    • Department of Veterans Affairs, Palo Alto, California, USA
    • Department of Psychiatry, Stanford University, Stanford, California USA
  • ,
  • Eleanor Castillo-Yee

      Affiliations

    • Department of Veterans Affairs, Palo Alto, California, USA
    • Department of Psychiatry, Stanford University, Stanford, California USA
  • ,
  • I.Jo Romine

      Affiliations

    • Department of Veterans Affairs, Palo Alto, California, USA
    • Department of Psychiatry, Stanford University, Stanford, California USA

Received 11 March 1996; received in revised form 7 August 1996

Abstract 

People attend to cues that convey information about social norms and try to comply with norms they believe are in force. Dispositions to comply with social norms are universal, suggesting that adherence to such norms is selectively advantageous. Possibly, compliance with social norms, however arbitrary these may be, serves a signaling function and is used to control attributions affecting fitness. To begin to test this hypothesis, we performed several experiments in which subjects watched videotapes of models violating everyday social norms and then rated those models on dimensions that would be relevant to the models' fitness, if subjects and models were socially interacting. In some experiments, violations of minor social norms significantly altered such ratings. Even subjects who failed to cite norm violations when given the opportunity nonetheless gave lower ratings to models as the result of norm violations. A manipulation that increased the salience of such norms increased the adverse effects of norms violations. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that norm compliance serves an important signaling function.

Keywords:  Behavioral evolution, Conformity, Inclusive fitness, Norm violations, Social norms, Social psychology

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0162-3095(97)82225-X

doi:10.1016/S0162-3095(97)82225-X

Ethology and Sociobiology
Volume 17, Issue 6 , Pages 403-416, November 1996