SAS Journal
Volume 3, Issue 3 , Pages 91-99 , September 2009

Does core mobility of lumbar total disc arthroplasty influence sagittal and frontal intervertebral displacement? Radiologic comparison with fixed-core prosthesis

  • Joël Delécrin, MD

      Affiliations

    • University Hospital – Orthopedic, CHU Hôtel Dieu, Nantes, France
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: Joël Delécrin, MD, University Hospital – Orthopedic, Orthopedie Hotel Dieu CHU, Nantes 44093, France; Phone: 33 2 40 08 48 60; Fax: 33 2 40 08 49 08
  • ,
  • Jérôme Allain, MD

      Affiliations

    • University Hospital – Orthopedic, Paris Creteil, France
  • ,
  • Jacques Beaurain, MD

      Affiliations

    • University Hospital – Neurosurgery, Dijon, France
  • ,
  • Jean-Paul Steib, MD

      Affiliations

    • University Hospital – Spine, Strasbourg, France
  • ,
  • Hervé Chataigner, MD

      Affiliations

    • Private Hospital – Orthopaedic, Besancon, France
  • ,
  • Lucie Aubourg, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Employee, LDR Compagny, Troyes, France
  • ,
  • Jean Huppert, MD

      Affiliations

    • Private Hospital – Neurosurgery, Saint Etienne, France
  • ,
  • Marc Ameil, MD

      Affiliations

    • Private Hospital – Orthopaedic, Reims, France
  • ,
  • Jean-Michel Nguyen, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • University Hospital – Biostatistic, Nantes, France

  • Image Result

    Sagittal vertebral translation measurement method. (A) The well-accepted method of Frobin was adapted (B) to total disc arthroplasty. Metal markers (the edges of the prosthesis endplates) were used in

    Sagittal vertebral translation measurement method. (A) The well-accepted method of Frobin was adapted (B) to total disc arthroplasty. Metal markers (the edges of the prosthesis endplates) were used instead of the bony landmarks. The middle of the vertebral bodies (C1 and C2) were substituted by the middle of the prosthesis endplates. The intervertebral translation (TV) was replaced by the translation between the superior and inferior prosthesis endplates.

  • Image Result
    Axial translation between mobile-core prosthesis endplates during lateral bending. (A) Antero-posterior oblique incidence was developed to obtain an equivalence of superior view of the prosthesis endp

    Axial translation between mobile-core prosthesis endplates during lateral bending. (A) Antero-posterior oblique incidence was developed to obtain an equivalence of superior view of the prosthesis endplates (B) in the right and (C) the left lateral bending. (D) (E) An other example with an increase of contrast to better differentiate the superior endplate from the inferior endplate to illustrate the axial translation between the two endplates.

  • Image Result
    Relation between core translation (in millimeters) and implanted segment lordosis (in degrees) with mobile-core prosthesis.

    Relation between core translation (in millimeters) and implanted segment lordosis (in degrees) with mobile-core prosthesis.

  • Image Result
    Relation between core translation (in millimeters) and vertebral translation (in millimeters) with mobile-core prosthesis. The vertebral translation decreases as the core translation increases.

    Relation between core translation (in millimeters) and vertebral translation (in millimeters) with mobile-core prosthesis. The vertebral translation decreases as the core translation increases.

  • Image Result
    Relation between vertebral translation (in millimeters) and ROM (in degrees) with fixed-core prosthesis.

    Relation between vertebral translation (in millimeters) and ROM (in degrees) with fixed-core prosthesis.

  • Image Result
    Range and distribution of motion at L5-S1, L4-5, and L3-4 levels for normal (data from literature), untreated (adjacent to treated levels), implanted with a mobile-core prosthesis, and implanted with

    Range and distribution of motion at L5-S1, L4-5, and L3-4 levels for normal (data from literature), untreated (adjacent to treated levels), implanted with a mobile-core prosthesis, and implanted with a fixed-core prosthesis levels. For untreated levels and implanted levels with a mobile-core prosthesis, the range of motion in flexion and in extension (lightest gray area) are differentiated.

  • Image Result
    Two examples of lateral bending assessment with mobile-core prosthesis showing two different tilting directions at implanted levels compared to the tilting direction of the whole lumbar spine. (A) An

    Two examples of lateral bending assessment with mobile-core prosthesis showing two different tilting directions at implanted levels compared to the tilting direction of the whole lumbar spine. (A) An operated segment tilting opposite to the whole lumbar spine tilting and (B) in the same direction. Blue arrow indicates the metal marker inside the core. Lateral bending films (A) and (B) also illustrate two different frontal displacements of the metal marker.

PII: S1935-9810(09)00002-4

doi: 10.1016/j.esas.2009.09.001

SAS Journal
Volume 3, Issue 3 , Pages 91-99 , September 2009