SAS Journal
Volume 3, Issue 3 , Pages 91-99 , September 2009

Does core mobility of lumbar total disc arthroplasty influence sagittal and frontal intervertebral displacement? Radiologic comparison with fixed-core prosthesis

  • Joël Delécrin, MD

      Affiliations

    • University Hospital – Orthopedic, CHU Hôtel Dieu, Nantes, France
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: Joël Delécrin, MD, University Hospital – Orthopedic, Orthopedie Hotel Dieu CHU, Nantes 44093, France; Phone: 33 2 40 08 48 60; Fax: 33 2 40 08 49 08
  • ,
  • Jérôme Allain, MD

      Affiliations

    • University Hospital – Orthopedic, Paris Creteil, France
  • ,
  • Jacques Beaurain, MD

      Affiliations

    • University Hospital – Neurosurgery, Dijon, France
  • ,
  • Jean-Paul Steib, MD

      Affiliations

    • University Hospital – Spine, Strasbourg, France
  • ,
  • Hervé Chataigner, MD

      Affiliations

    • Private Hospital – Orthopaedic, Besancon, France
  • ,
  • Lucie Aubourg, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Employee, LDR Compagny, Troyes, France
  • ,
  • Jean Huppert, MD

      Affiliations

    • Private Hospital – Neurosurgery, Saint Etienne, France
  • ,
  • Marc Ameil, MD

      Affiliations

    • Private Hospital – Orthopaedic, Reims, France
  • ,
  • Jean-Michel Nguyen, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • University Hospital – Biostatistic, Nantes, France

References 

  1. Leivseth G, Braaten S, Frobin W, Brinckmann P. Mobility of lumbar segments instrumented with a ProDisc II prosthesis: A two-year follow-up study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;15:1726–1733
  2. McAfee PC, Cunningham BW, Holsapple G, et al. A prospective, randomized, multicenter food and drug administration investigation device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the Charité artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part II: evaluation of radiographic outcomes and correlation of surgical technique accuracy with clinical outcomes. Spine. 2005;30(14):1576–1583
  3. McAfee PC, Cunningham BW, Hayes V, et al. Biomechanical analysis of rotational motions after disc arthroplasty: implications for patients with adult deformities. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31(19 Suppl):S152–S160
  4. SariAli EH, Lemaire JP, Pascal-Mousselard H, Carrier H, Skalli W. In vivo study of the kinematics in axial rotation of the lumbar spine after total intervertebral disc replacement: long-term results: a 10–14 years follow up evaluation. Eur Spine J. 2006;15(10):1501–1510
  5. Tournier C, Aunoble S, Le Huec JC, Lemaire JP, Tropiano P, Lafage V, et al. Total disc arthroplasty: consequences for sagittal balance and lumbar spine movement. Eur Spine J. 2007;16(3):411–421
  6. Guyer RD, Ohnmeiss DD. Intervertebral disc prostheses. Spine. 2003;28(15S):S15–S23
  7. Galbusera F, Bellini CM, Zweig T, et al. Design concepts in lumbar total disc arthroplasty. Eur Spine J. 2008;17(12):1635–1650
  8. Panjabi M, Oxland T, Yamamoto I, Crisco J. Mechanical behavior of the human lumbar and lumbosacral spine shown by three-dimensional load-displacement curves. J Bone Joint Surg. 1994;76-A:413–424
  9. Frobin W, Brinckmann P, Biggemann M, et al. Precision measurement of disc height, vertebral height and sagittal plane displacement from lateral radiographic views of the lumbar spine. Clin Biomech. 1996;12(suppl 1):1–63
  10. Bonnet DG. Sample size requirements for estimating intraclass correlations with desired precision. Stat Med. 2002;21(9):1331–1335
  11. Lim MR, Girardi FP, Zhang K, Huang RC, Peterson MG, Cammisa FP. Measurement of total disc replacement radiographic range of motion: a comparison of two techniques. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005;18:252–256
  12. Johnson R, Axelsson P, Strömqvist B. Mobility provocation of lumbar fusion evaluated bys radiostereometric analysis. Acta Orthop Scand. 1996;67(Suppl):45–46
  13. Leivseth G, Brinckmann P, Frobin W, Johnson R, Strömqvist B. Assessment of sagittal plane segmental motion in lumbar spine: a comparison between distortion-compensated and stereophotogrammetric roentgen analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998;23(23):2648–2655
  14. Ordway NR, Fayyazi AH, Abjornson C, et al. Twelve-month follow-up of lumbar spine range of motion following intervertebral disc replacement using radiostereometric analysis. SAS Journal Winter. 2008;2:9–15
  15. Cakir B, Richter M, Puhl W, Schmidt R. Reliability of motion measurements after total disc replacement: the spike and the fin method. Eur Spine J. 2006;15(2):165–173
  16. Park CK, Ryu KS, Jee WH. Degenerative changes of discs and facet joints in lumbar total disc replacement using ProDisc II: minimum two-Year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33(16):1755–1761
  17. Moumene M, Geisler FH. Comparison of biomechanical function at ideal and varied surgical placement for two lumbar artificial disc implant designs: Mobile-core versus fixed-core. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;17:1840–1851
  18. Pearcy MJ, Tibrewal SB. Axial rotation and lateral bending in the normal lumbar spine measurement by three dimensional radiography. Spine. 1984;9(6):582–587
  19. Lemaire JP, Carrier H, Sariali el-H, Skalli W, Lavaste F. Clinical and radiological outcomes with the Charité artificial disc: a 10-year minimum follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005;18(4):353–359
  20. Dvorák J, Vajda EG, Grob D, Panjabi MM. Normal motion of the lumbar spine as related to age and gender. Eur Spine J. 1995;4(1):18–23

PII: S1935-9810(09)00002-4

doi: 10.1016/j.esas.2009.09.001

SAS Journal
Volume 3, Issue 3 , Pages 91-99 , September 2009