European Urology
Volume 48, Issue 1 , Pages 121-128, July 2005

Augmentation Phalloplasty Surgery for Penile Dysmorphophobia in Young Adults: Considerations Regarding Patient Selection, Outcome Evaluation and Techniques Applied

  • Evangelos Spyropoulos

      Affiliations

    • Urology Department, Naval and Veterans Hospital of Athens, 24 Riga Fereou str., Paleo Faliro 17563, Athens, Greece
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel. +30 210 9831951/6932544883(Mobile); Fax: +30 210 9831951.
  • ,
  • Charalambos Christoforidis

      Affiliations

    • Plastic Surgery Department, Naval and Veterans Hospital of Athens, Athens, Greece
  • ,
  • Dimitrios Borousas

      Affiliations

    • Urology Department, Naval and Veterans Hospital of Athens, 24 Riga Fereou str., Paleo Faliro 17563, Athens, Greece
  • ,
  • Stamatios Mavrikos

      Affiliations

    • Urology Department, Naval and Veterans Hospital of Athens, 24 Riga Fereou str., Paleo Faliro 17563, Athens, Greece
  • ,
  • Michael Bourounis

      Affiliations

    • Urology Department, Naval and Veterans Hospital of Athens, 24 Riga Fereou str., Paleo Faliro 17563, Athens, Greece
  • ,
  • Sotirios Athanasiadis

      Affiliations

    • Urology Department, Naval and Veterans Hospital of Athens, 24 Riga Fereou str., Paleo Faliro 17563, Athens, Greece

Accepted 22 February 2005. published online 29 March 2005.

Abstract 

Objectives:

To report on the efficacy and safety of augmentation phalloplasty procedures in physically normal young men, to introduce a patient selection and outcome evaluation questionnaire as well as, to propose a surgical technique modification.

Methods:

Eleven (11) out of 28 psychosomatically normal men (25–35 years) who presented complaining of penile dysmorphophobia (subjective perception of small penis), were subjected to: (a) penile lengthening (suprapubic skin advancement – ligamentolysis): n=5, (b) penile lengthening and shaft thickening (free dermal-fat graft shaft coverage): n=3 and (c) panniculectomy – suprapubic lipectomy and penile lengthening: n=2. A self administered questionnaire was employed in order to facilitate selection of the patients qualifying for the operation as well as to evaluate the outcome. In addition, a technical modification regarding dermal-fat graft handling was applied.

Results:

The postoperative course was uneventful with minor complications. The mean penile length gain (flaccid - stretched penis) was 1.6cm (1–2.3cm) [p=0.0014], the mean circumference gain was 2.3cm [p=0.003] at the base and 2.6cm [p=0.0012] subcoronaly. Significant (20%–53%) [p<0.0001] sexual self-esteem and functioning improvement was reported by the majority (91%) of patients.

Conclusions:

Although penile size alteration was not spectacular or satisfying the patients’ “great” expectations, the substantially uneventful clinical course coupled with the significant improvement in sexual self-esteem and function and the highly accepted outcome by the patients, render augmentation phalloplasty reasonable treatment modality for the management of strictly selected and thoroughly informed young adults who suffer from penile dysmorphophobia.

Keywords: Penile dysmorphophobia, Small penis, Penile lengthening, Penile enlargement, Outcome evaluation

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • The primary website for this journal is located at http://www.europeanurology.com/.

    If you are an EAU member or personal subscriber, please visit this site to log in or claim access.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0302-2838(05)00093-X

doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2005.02.021

European Urology
Volume 48, Issue 1 , Pages 121-128, July 2005