Journal Home
Search for

Volume 49, Issue 3, Pages 551-556 (March 2006)


View previous. 22 of 35 View next.

Supratrigonal VVF Repair by Modified O’Connor's Technique: An Experience of 26 Cases

Divakar Dalelaa, Priyadarshi RanjanbCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Pushpa Lata Sankhwarc, Satya N. Sankhwara, Vineet Najaa, Apul Goela

Accepted 13 December 2005. published online 06 January 2006.

Abstract 

Objective

To report the technical modifications of O’Connor's procedure and their outcome in 26 supratrigonal vesico vaginal fistulae.

Materials and methods

Twenty-six cases of supratrigonal VVF (17 primary, 9 recurrent) were operated using the described modifications. It consisted of approaching the bladder transperitoneally, without dissecting the retropubic space, making a short sagittal or parasagittal cystotomy in between stay sutures, liberal use of bladder rotation flaps instead of midline closure, using single layer, continuous, closely placed, interlocking stitches for bladder as well as vaginal approximation and universal use of vascularised tissue interposition.

Results

Mean fistula size was 2.8cm (range 1.0 to 3.7). Mean operative time was 104 minutes, and blood loss was insignificant. Three patients required ureteroneocystostomy. All patients were dry after 2–3 weeks of suprapubic and per urethral catheter drainage. One patient persisted with stress urinary incontinence. No patient on follow up complained of features suggestive of prolonged ileus, peritonitis or adhesive intestinal obstruction.

Conclusion

Modified O’Connor's repair is safe and achieves excellent functional results. It requires a shorter cystotomy instead of bi-valving of the bladder, thus minimizes tissue trauma, intraoperative blood loss and operating time. It also gives option of tailoring the cystotomy in sagittal or parasagittal line, according to the site and size of the fistula, and thus permits closure of fistula by rotation of bladder flap into the defect without any lateral traction on the bladder edges. Retropubic dissection and drainage of the retropubic space is also not required.

a Department of Urology, King George Medical University, Lucknow, UP, India

b Department of Surgery, King George Medical University, Lucknow, UP, India

c Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, King George Medical University, Lucknow, UP, India

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Sector-20, house-no-25, Indira Nagar, Lucknow, UP 226016, India. Tel. +91 9335211703.

PII: S0302-2838(05)00857-2

doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2005.12.037


View previous. 22 of 35 View next.