Paternity leave in Sweden—Costs, savings and health gains

Månsdotter, Anna; Lindholm, Lars; Winkvist, Anna

doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2006.09.006

« Previous Next »Health Policy
Volume 82, Issue 1 , Pages 102-115, June 2007

Paternity leave in Sweden—Costs, savings and health gains

Anna Månsdotter
- Research Department, Swedish National Institute of Public Health, SE-103 52 Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Epidemiology and Public Health Sciences, Umeå University, SE-901 85 Umeå, Sweden
- Department of Public Health Science, Division of Social Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden
- Corresponding author at: Research Department, Swedish National Institute of Public Health, SE-103 52 Stockholm, Sweden. Tel.: +46 8 5661 36 14; fax: +46 8 5661 35 05.
Lars Lindholm
- Research Department, Swedish National Institute of Public Health, SE-103 52 Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Epidemiology and Public Health Sciences, Umeå University, SE-901 85 Umeå, Sweden
- Tel.: +46 90 785 29 34; fax: +46 90 13 89 77.
Anna Winkvist
- Department of Clinical Nutrition, Sahlgrenska Academy, Göteborg University, Box 459, SE-405 30 Göteborg, Sweden
- Tel.: +46 31 773 3728; fax: +46 31 82 94 75.

published online 13 October 2006.

Abstract

Objectives

The initial objective is to examine the relationship between paternity leave in 1978–1979 and male mortality during 1981–2001, and the second objective is to calculate the cost-effectiveness of the 1974 parental insurance reform in Sweden.

Methods

Based on a population of all Swedish couples who had their first child together in 1978 (45,801 males), the risk of death for men who took paternity leave, compared with men who did not, was estimated by odds ratios. The cost-effectiveness analysis considered costs for information, administration and production losses, minus savings due to decreased sickness leave and inpatient care, compared to health gains in life-years and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs).

Results

It is demonstrated that fathers who took paternity leave have a statistically significant decreased death risk of 16%. Costs minus savings (discounted values) stretch from a net cost of EUR 19 million to a net saving of EUR 11 million, and the base case cost-effectiveness is EUR 8000 per QALY.

Conclusions

The study indicates that that the right to paternity leave is a desirable reform based on commonly stated public health, economic, and feminist goals. The critical issue in future research should be to examine impact from health-related selection.

Keywords: Fathers, Parental leave, Health, Cost-effectiveness