Journal Home
Search for

Volume 93, Issue 1, Pages 27-34 (November 2009)


View previous. 5 of 11 View next.

The choice of obstetric care by low-risk pregnant women in the Netherlands: Implications for policy and management

Milena PavlovaaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Marijke Hendrixb, Elvira Nouwensa, Jan Nijhuisb, Godefridus van Merodea

published online 19 June 2009.

Abstract 

In the Netherlands, pregnant women at low risk of complications during pregnancy, have the opportunity to choose freely between giving birth at home or in a hospital maternity unit. This study analyses how various attributes of obstetric care, socio-economic characteristics and attitudes influence the decisions that these women make with regard to obstetric care. The method of discrete-choice experiment was applied in the process of data collection and analysis. The data were collected among low-risk nulliparous pregnant women. The analysis suggests that there are strong preferences among some Dutch women for a home birth. Nevertheless, the absence of a medical pain-relief treatment during home birth, might provide incentives for some women to opt for a birth in a hospital, especially at the end of their pregnancy. If the attractiveness of home birth should be preserved in the Netherlands, specific attention should be paid on the approach to pain during a home birth. Efforts could also be made in offering a domestic atmosphere during hospital births to improve hospital-based obstetric care in view of women's preferences.

a Department of Health Organisation, Policy and Economics, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht University, The Netherlands

b Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, The Netherlands

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Department of HOPE (BEOZ), Faculty of HMLS, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands. Tel.: +31 (0)43 3881705; fax: +31 (0)43 3670960.

PII: S0168-8510(09)00137-7

doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.05.008


View previous. 5 of 11 View next.