Journal Home
Search for

Volume 93, Issue 1, Pages 35-40 (November 2009)


View previous. 6 of 11 View next.

Hospital investment policy in France: Pathways to efficiency and the efficiency of the pathways

Isabelle GuerreroaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Philippe R. Mosséb1email address, Vaughan Rogersc2email address

published online 24 June 2009.

Abstract 

Objectives

This article examines the ambivalent notion of New Public Management as applied to health policy in France, by investigating the implementation of the efficiency-driven hospital investment plan, Hôpital 2012, conceived at national level, but implemented through regional hospital authorities (ARHs), with formal responsibility for selecting successful funding applications.

Methods

The methodology combines qualitative and quantitative analysis, in order to highlight and explain discrepancies between goals and results.

Results

Despite formal adherence to objective efficiency indicators, certain decisions were based on incomplete information and others on considerations outwith initially established criteria. Competition from the private sector was perceived as a threat to public hospitals and the public sector emerged as a major beneficiary of the investment plan. Central ministerial intervention emphasising financial and quantitative considerations led the ARHs to focus more on individual hospital performance than on wider healthcare needs.

Conclusions

Data-production became almost an end in itself, threatening to undermine the objectives it sought to pursue. Nonetheless, extended deadlines entailed by ministerial intervention were appropriated as a resource by local actors, leading to ARH decisions which deviated from the official efficiency model, but resulted in increased effectiveness, taking fuller account of local conditions.

a CR2M, University of Montpellier 2, Eugène Bataillon 34 095 Montpellier, France

b LEST-CNRS, UMR 6123, University of Aix-Marseille 35 Av J. Ferry, 13626 Aix en Provence, France

c College of Humanities and Social Science, University of Edinburgh, 59 George Square, Edinburgh EH8 9JU, United Kingdom

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +33 06 15 20 39 01.

 The authors express their thanks to the MAINH-ANAP prefiguration, to the staff of the two ARHs and to the two anonymous referees.

1 Tel.: +33 04 42 37 85 30.

2 Tel.: +44 0131 650 8414; fax: +44 0131 650 8408.

PII: S0168-8510(09)00142-0

doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.05.013


View previous. 6 of 11 View next.