Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry
Volume 24, Issue 5 , Pages 613-616, September 1985

Teacher Ratings of Attention Problems in Children Experimentally Classified as Exhibiting Attention Deficit Disorder with and without Hyperactivity

  • BENJAMIN B. LAHEY, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Dr. Lahey is Professor of Psychology at the University of Georgia
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprints may be requested from Dr. Lahey, Georgia Children's Center, Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602.
  • ,
  • ELIZABETH A. SCHAUGHENCY, B.S.

      Affiliations

    • Ms. Schaughency is a graduate student in Clinical Psychology at the University of Georgia
  • ,
  • CYNTHIA L. FRAME, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Dr. Strauss is Instructor in Child Psychiatry at Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh
  • ,
  • CYD C. STRAUSS, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Dr. Frame is Assistant Professor of Psychology at the University of Georgia

Received 24 April 1984; received in revised form 16 July 1984; accepted 9 November 1984.

From a total of 625 children, 30 children in grades 2–5 were experimentally classified as having Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity (ADD/H: N = 10) or Attention Deficit without Hyperactivity (ADD/WO: N = 20) using teacher ratings of behavior on the Revised Behavior Problem Checklist (RBPC). These groups were compared to normal control children (N = 20) on each of the items that comprise the Attention Problem-Immaturity (API) factor of the RBPC. Both ADD groups were rated by teachers as exhibiting significantly greater attention problems than controls on 12 of the 16 items on the factor. However, the ADD/H children were rated as more irresponsible, sloppy, distractible, impulsive, less sluggish, more likely to answer without thinking, and faster in finishing assignments than the ADD/WO children. In addition, only the ADD/H group differed significantly from controls on ratings of impulsivity and anwering without thinking, and only the ADD/WO group differed from controls on ratings of sluggishness and drowsiness. A stepwise discriminant analysis showed that the two ADD groups could be accurately discriminated (average canonical r2 = 0.83) by a combination of ratings of impulsivity, sluggishness, immaturity, sloppiness, slowness, and need for supervision. These results suggest that ADD/H and ADD/WO may exhibit dissimilar types of attention deficits.

Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 24, 5:613–616, 1985.

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

 

 The assistance of Linda Eason, Debora Fleming, Rex Forehand, John Piacentini, and Karen Smith at various stages of the project is gratefully acknowledged. Particular thanks are extended to Mr. Eddie Hill and Mr. Robert Perry and the teachers of Madison County schools. This research was supported in part by grants from the University of Georgia Biomedical Research and Research Foundation Funds to Dr. Frame.

PII: S0002-7138(09)60064-9

doi:10.1016/S0002-7138(09)60064-9

Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry
Volume 24, Issue 5 , Pages 613-616, September 1985