Journal of Adolescent Health Care
Volume 11, Issue 6 , Pages 505-509, November 1990

Comparison of three new nonculture tests in the diagnosis of Chlamydia genital infections

  • Howard H. Schubiner, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to: Howard Schubiner, M.D., Wayne State University, University Health Center 5-C, 4201 St. Antoine, Detroit, MI 48201.
    • From the Departments of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA
  • ,
  • William Lebar, M.S.

      Affiliations

    • From the Departments of Pathology and Microbiology Providence Hospital, Southfield, Michigan, USA
  • ,
  • Claudia Jemal

      Affiliations

    • From the Department of Microbiology, Providence Hospital, Southfield, Michigan, USA
  • ,
  • Barry Hershman, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • From the Departments of Pathology and Microbiology, Providence Hospital, Southfield, Michigan, USA

Accepted 5 March 1990.

Abstract 

This study compares three new rapid nonculture tests to cell culture with passage for the diagnosis of Chlamydia genital infections in sexually active adolescent and young adult females. Two hundred consecutive patients having a pelvic examination had cervical samples taken for the following: Papanicolaou smear, gonorrhea culture, Chlamydia cell culture, direct fluorescent antibody (DFA; Difco), isotopic DNA probe (Gen-Probe), and enzyme immunoassay (EIA; IDEIA III, Novo BioLabs). After resolution of discrepant results, 25 of the specimens were judged to be positive. The DFA identified 17 of the 25, with 3 false-positive results; the DNA probe identified 20 of the 25, with no false positive results; and the EIA identified 22 of the 25, with one false-positive result. The sensitivities, specificities, and positive and negative predictive values, respectively, were DFA, 68%, 98.2%, 85%, 95.5%; DNA probe, 80%, 100%, 100%, 97.2%; and EIA, 88%, 99.4%, 95.6%, 98.3%. These new rapid nonculture tests are comparable and relatively reliable, with trends favoring the EIA and the DNA probe. Further studies with larger samples are needed to determine their clinical utility.

Keywords: Chlamydia trachomatis Diagnosis Direct fluorescent antibody Isotopic DNA probe Enzyme immunoassay

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Grant support was provided by the Providence Foundation. Reagents were donated by Difco Laborities, GenProbe, and Novo BioLabs.

PII: 0197-0070(90)90111-E

Journal of Adolescent Health Care
Volume 11, Issue 6 , Pages 505-509, November 1990