JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
Volume 3, Issue 2 , Pages 203-212, February 2010

Enoxaparin in Primary and Facilitated Percutaneous Coronary Intervention:

A Formal Prospective Nonrandomized Substudy of the FINESSE Trial (Facilitated INtervention with Enhanced Reperfusion Speed to Stop Events)

  • Gilles Montalescot, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Pitiè-Salpêtrière University Hospital, Paris, France
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Gilles Montalescot, Institut de Cardiologie, INSERM U937, 47 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
  • ,
  • Stephen G. Ellis, MD

      Affiliations

    • Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
  • ,
  • Mark A. de Belder, MD

      Affiliations

    • The James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • Luc Janssens, MD

      Affiliations

    • AZ Imelda Ziekenhuis, Bonheiden, Belgium
  • ,
  • Olivier Katz, MD

      Affiliations

    • Clinique Saint-Joseph, Colmar, France
  • ,
  • Wladyslaw Pluta, MD

      Affiliations

    • Wojewodzkie Centrum Medyczne, Opole, Poland
  • ,
  • Patrick Ecollan, MD

      Affiliations

    • Pitiè-Salpêtrière University Hospital, Paris, France
  • ,
  • Michal Tendera, MD

      Affiliations

    • Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
  • ,
  • Ad J. van Boven, MD

      Affiliations

    • Medisch Centrum Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands
  • ,
  • Petr Widimsky, MD

      Affiliations

    • University Hospital FN Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
  • ,
  • Henning R. Andersen, MD

      Affiliations

    • Skejby University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
  • ,
  • Amadeo Betriu, MD

      Affiliations

    • Hospital Clinic I Provincial, Barcelona, Spain
  • ,
  • Paul Armstrong, MD

      Affiliations

    • University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
  • ,
  • Bruce R. Brodie, MD

      Affiliations

    • LeBauer Cardiovascular Research, Greensboro, North Carolina
  • ,
  • Howard C. Herrmann, MD

      Affiliations

    • University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • ,
  • Franz-Josef Neumann, MD

      Affiliations

    • Herz-Zentrum Bad Krozingen, Bad Krozingen, Germany
  • ,
  • Mark B. Effron, MD

      Affiliations

    • Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana
  • ,
  • Jiandong Lu, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Centocor Research and Development, Inc., Malvern, Pennsylvania
  • ,
  • Elliot S. Barnathan, MD

      Affiliations

    • Centocor Research and Development, Inc., Malvern, Pennsylvania
  • ,
  • Eric J. Topol, MD

      Affiliations

    • The Scripps Research Institute and Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, California
  • ,
  • FINESSE Investigators

Received 13 July 2009; received in revised form 19 October 2009; accepted 13 November 2009.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to assess the risk-benefit of enoxaparin (Sanofi-Aventis, Paris, France) in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Background

Randomized studies have demonstrated the superiority of enoxaparin over unfractionated heparin (UFH) in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with fibrinolytics.

Methods

In the FINESSE (Facilitated INtervention with Enhanced Reperfusion Speed to Stop Events) trial—a double-blind, placebo-controlled study—2,452 patients with STEMI were randomized to primary PCI or facilitated PCI with abciximab alone or with half-dose reteplase. In this prospective FINESSE substudy, centers pre-specified use of either enoxaparin (0.5 mg/kg intravenous [IV], 0.3 mg/kg subcutaneous [SC]) or UFH (40 U/kg IV, 3,000 U maximum) with PCI. A logistic-regression model and a propensity multivariate model, both adjusted for baseline variables, were used to evaluate primary safety and secondary efficacy end points for enoxaparin versus UFH.

Results

Enoxaparin was administered to 759 patients and UFH to 1,693 patients. Nonintracranial Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) major/minor bleeding was not significantly different, but lower nonintracranial TIMI major bleeding was found with enoxaparin (2.6% vs. UFH 4.4%, logistic-regression adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.31 to 0.99, p = 0.045), whereas intracranial hemorrhage was similar (0.27% vs. 0.24%, adjusted OR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.11 to 9.68, p = 0.980). Lower death, myocardial infarction, urgent revascularization, or refractory ischemia through 30 days was also associated with enoxaparin (5.3%) versus UFH (8.0%, adjusted OR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.31 to 0.72, p = 0.0005) as was all-cause mortality through 90 days (3.8% vs. 5.6%, respectively, adjusted OR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.35 to 0.99, p = 0.046). End points evaluating the net clinical benefit also significantly favored enoxaparin over UFH.

Conclusions

Enoxaparin seems to be associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular outcomes compared with UFH in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI. Confirmation of these findings in a randomized study is warranted. (A Study of Abciximab and Reteplase When Administered Prior to Catheterization After a Myocardial Infarction [Finesse]; NCT00046228)

Key Words: heparin, inhibitors, reperfusion

Abbreviations and Acronyms: ACT, activated clotting time, BMI, body mass index, CI, confidence interval, ECG, electrocardiogram, IV, intravenous, MI, myocardial infarction, OR, odds ratio, PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention, SC, subcutaneous, UFH, unfractionated heparin, STEMI, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, TIMI, Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This work was supported by Centocor, Inc., Malvern, Pennsylvania, and Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, Indiana. Dr. Montalescot reports receiving consulting fees, speaking fees, and research grant support from Eli Lilly and Sanofi-Aventis. Dr. Ellis reports being employed and Dr. Topol reports having been employed by the Cleveland Clinic, which received research funds from Eli Lilly and Centocor to assist in the coordination of this study. Dr. de Belder reports receiving advisory board fees from Eli Lilly, fees provided for the United Kingdom coordination of the FINESSE trial, and lecture fees from Eli Lilly. Dr. Armstrong reports receiving research grants from Schering-Plough, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Hoffmann-La Roche. Dr. Effron reports being employed by Eli Lilly. Dr. Widimsky reports receiving consulting fees and speaking fees from Eli Lilly. Dr. Andersen reports receiving speaking fees and research grants from Eli Lilly. Dr. Herrmann reports receiving speaking fees from Schering-Plough and research grants from the Medicines Company, Conor Medsystems, and Schering-Plough. Drs. Barnathan and Lu report being employed by Centocor.

PII: S1936-8798(09)00832-2

doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2009.11.012

JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
Volume 3, Issue 2 , Pages 203-212, February 2010