Journal of Epilepsy
Volume 11, Issue 6 , Pages 290-295, November 1998

An audit of the use of vigabatrin in the treatment of medically refractory epilepsy at a presurgical unit

  • Stanislaw Kozak

      Affiliations

    • From the Department of Epileptology and Electroencephalography, Neurology Clinic, University Hospital, Zürich, Switzerland
  • ,
  • Wolfgang Russ

      Affiliations

    • From the Hoechst Marion Roussel, Zürich, Switzerland
  • ,
  • Heinz Gregor Wieser

      Affiliations

    • From the Department of Epileptology and Electroencephalography, Neurology Clinic, University Hospital, Zürich, Switzerland
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Prof. Dr. Med. H. G. Wieser, Department of Epileptology and Electroencephalography, Neurology Clinic University Hospital, CH-8091 Zürich.

Received 10 November 1997; accepted 2 March 1998.

In this retrospective study we examined the use of vigabatrin (VGB) in the presurgical evaluation unit at the Department of Epileptology and Electroencephalography of the University Hospital of Zürich. Vigabatrin had been used in 125 out of 750 difficult-to-treat patients with epilepsy. They received VGB primarily as add-on therapy because of drug-resistance to first-line antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). With a few exceptions, most patients suffered from frequent partial seizures with and without secondary generalization. In 22.4% of patients VGB showed a beneficial long-term effect with > 50% seizure reduction and an additional 5.5% of patients became seizure-free without epilepsy surgery. Most frequent reasons for discontinuation were “no efficacy” and “loss of efficacy” after short-turn improvement, followed by adverse events. Adverse events most frequently observed were weight gain (5%); tiredness (3%); and “confusion, depersonalization, and psychosis” (2%). The year-by-year retention rate for VGB for the 125 patients was 55% after 1 year and 22% after 5 years. These long-term retention rates are lower than those observed in controlled clinical trials. We conclude that the year-by-year retention rate represents a more realistic and most probably the most useful measure for the value of VGB in the long-term management of a difficult-to-treat epilepsy population.

Key words: Vigabatrin, Long-term-efficacy, Difficult-to-treat epilepsy, Discontinuation of treatment, Year-by-year retention rates

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0896-6974(98)00033-4

doi:10.1016/S0896-6974(98)00033-4

Journal of Epilepsy
Volume 11, Issue 6 , Pages 290-295, November 1998