Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
Volume 27, Issue 2 , Pages 153-159, September 2004

Consensus statement on office-based treatment of opioid dependence using buprenorphine

  • David A. Fiellin, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel: +1 203 688 2984; fax: +1 203 688 4092
  • ,
  • Herbert Kleber, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
  • ,
  • Jeanne G. Trumble-Hejduk, MSW

      Affiliations

    • American Academy of Addiction Psychiatry, Washington, DC, USA
  • ,
  • A. Thomas McLellan, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, and Treatment Research Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA
  • ,
  • Thomas R. Kosten, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
    • VISN 1 Mental Illness, Research and Education and Clinical Center New Haven, CT, and the VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA

Received 15 May 2004; accepted 15 June 2004.

Abstract 

Buprenorphine and buprenorphine/naloxone (BUP) are newly approved for office-based treatment of opioid dependence. Federal and non-federal regulatory and monitoring agencies, national and international researchers, national professional organizations, researchers involved in monitoring, opioid treatment programs and the pharmaceutical industry met to synthesize and disseminate practical information to guide training, practice, monitoring, regulation and evaluation efforts with these medications. We performed a review of the literature, training curricula and practice guidelines and commissioned manuscripts describing recently completed, or still in progress, studies or field experiences with BUP treatment. A consensus process generated fifteen statements: (1) The federal government should collect baseline data on opioid-related deaths and morbidity to assess the effect of BUP on public health, (2) the patient limit for group practices should apply to individual physicians rather than group practices, (3 and 4) telephone and Internet-based physician and pharmacist support is needed, (5) clinicians who provide psychosocial services to opioid dependent patients should be informed of the role of BUP, (6) opioid-dependent patients should be instructed to present for induction in mild withdrawal, (7) the existing Center for Substance Abuse Treatment guidelines provide a reasonable induction protocol, (8) physicians should be prepared to use ancillary medications with BUP induction, (9) a physician or nurse must be available to the patient during the induction period, (10) concurrent counseling and support services are necessary, (11) detoxification without appropriate followup addiction treatment leads to rapid relapse and is not as effective as maintenance, (12) pregnant opioid-dependent women should be treated using good clinical practice including specialist addiction care and prenatal care, (13) BUP induction and withdrawal treatment may benefit from different designations for payment, (14) take-home medication options should be tailored to patients' needs, (15) there is a need for clinical and policy research in unique patient populations.

Keywords: Opioid-related disorders, Buprenorphine, Heroin dependence, Mental health services, Consensus Development Conferences

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Support for this consensus conference and publication was provided by the Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation PRISM grant to the Treatment Research Institute of Philadelphia. The preparation of this statement was not supported or influenced by the pharmaceutical industry.

PII: S0740-5472(04)00080-7

doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2004.06.005

Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
Volume 27, Issue 2 , Pages 153-159, September 2004