Schizophrenia Research
Volume 81, Issue 2 , Pages 269-275, 31 January 2006

Positive family environment predicts improvement in symptoms and social functioning among adolescents at imminent risk for onset of psychosis

  • Mary P. O'Brien

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychiatry, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles, United States
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. 300 UCLA Medical Plaza, Box 696824, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States. Tel.: +1 310 206 3466; fax: +1 310 794 9517.
  • ,
  • Jamie L. Gordon

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, United States
  • ,
  • Carrie E. Bearden

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychiatry, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles, United States
  • ,
  • Steve R. Lopez

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, United States
  • ,
  • Alex Kopelowicz

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychiatry, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles, United States
  • ,
  • Tyrone D. Cannon

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychiatry, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles, United States
    • Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, United States

Received 16 May 2005; received in revised form 16 September 2005; accepted 3 October 2005.

Abstract 

This study investigated whether family factors, such as criticism, emotional over-involvement (EOI), warmth, and positive remarks, as measured by the Camberwell Family Interview (CFI), predict symptom change and social outcome for individuals identified as at imminent risk for conversion to psychosis. Twenty-six adolescent patients were administered the Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndromes and the Strauss–Carpenter Outcome Scale at baseline and follow-up assessment approximately three months later. Patients' primary caregivers were administered the CFI at baseline. After controlling for symptom severity at baseline, there were significant associations between caregivers' EOI at baseline and improvement in high-risk youths' negative symptoms and social functioning at follow-up. Similarly, caregivers' positive remarks at baseline were associated with improvement in negative and disorganized symptoms at follow-up, and warmth expressed by caregivers was associated with improved social functioning at follow-up. Although family members' critical comments were not related to patients' symptoms, the majority of critical remarks were focused on patients' negative symptoms and irritability/aggression, which may be important targets for early intervention. These preliminary results provide a first glimpse into the relationship between family factors and symptom development during the prodrome and suggest that positive family involvement predicts decreased symptoms and enhanced social functioning at this early stage. The finding that four-fifths of the youth enrolled in this early intervention clinical research program have shown symptomatic improvement by the three-month assessment point is very encouraging from an early detection/early intervention standpoint.

Keywords: Family environment, Expressed emotion, High-risk youth, Prodrome

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0920-9964(05)00467-6

doi:10.1016/j.schres.2005.10.005

Schizophrenia Research
Volume 81, Issue 2 , Pages 269-275, 31 January 2006