Theriogenology
Volume 63, Issue 5 , Pages 1454-1468, 15 March 2005

Effect of estradiol valerate on ovarian follicle dynamics and superovulatory response in progestin-treated cattle

  • M.G. Colazo

      Affiliations

    • Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, Western College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Sask., Canada S7N 5B4
  • ,
  • M.F. Martínez

      Affiliations

    • Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, Western College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Sask., Canada S7N 5B4
  • ,
  • J.A. Small

      Affiliations

    • Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Research Centre, Brandon, Man., Canada
  • ,
  • J.P. Kastelic

      Affiliations

    • Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Research Centre, Lethbridge, Alta., Canada
  • ,
  • C.A. Burnley

      Affiliations

    • Southern Embryo, Athens, GA, USA
  • ,
  • D.R. Ward

      Affiliations

    • Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Research Centre, Brandon, Man., Canada
  • ,
  • R.J. Mapletoft

      Affiliations

    • Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, Western College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Sask., Canada S7N 5B4
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 306 966 7149; fax: +1 306 966 7159.

Received 26 February 2004; received in revised form 10 July 2004; accepted 10 July 2004.

Abstract 

Three experiments evaluated the effects of estradiol valerate (EV) on ovarian follicular and CL dynamics, intervals to estrus and ovulation, and superovulatory response in cattle. Experiment 1 compared the efficacy of two norgestomet ear implants (Crestar and Syncro-Mate B; SMB) for 9 d (with PGF at implant removal), combined with either 5mg estradiol-17β and 100mg progesterone (EP) or 5mg EV and 3mg norgestomet (EN) im at the time of implant insertion on CL diameter and follicular wave dynamics. Ovaries were monitored by ultrasonography. There was no effect of norgestomet implant. Diameter of the CL decreased following EN treatment (P < 0.01). Mean (± S.D.) day of follicular wave emergence (FWE) was earlier (P < 0.0001) and less variable (P < 0.0001) in EP- (3.6 ± 0.5 d) than in EN- (5.7 ± 1.5 d) treated heifers. Intervals from implant removal to estrus (P < 0.001) and ovulation (P < 0.01) were shorter in EN- (45.7 ± 11.7 and 74.3 ± 12.6h, respectively) than in EP- (56.4 ± 14.1 and 83.3 ± 17.0h, respectively) treated heifers. Experiment 2 compared the efficacy of EP versus EN in synchronizing FWE for superovulation in SMB-implanted cows. At random stages of the estrous cycle, Holstein cows (n = 78) received two SMB implants (Day 0) and were randomly assigned to receive EN on Day 0 or EP on Day 1. Folltropin-V treatments were initiated on the evening of Day 5, with PGF in the morning and evening of Day 8, when SMB were removed. Cows were inseminated after the onset of estrus and embryos were recovered 7 d later. Non-lactating cows had more CL (16.7 ± 11.3 versus 8.3 ± 4.9) and total ova/embryos (14.7 ± 9.5 versus 7.9 ± 4.6) than lactating cows (P < 0.05). EP-treated cows tended (P = 0.09) to yield more transferable embryos (5.6 ± 5.2) than EN-treated cows (4.0 ± 3.7). Experiment 3 compared the effect of dose of EV on ovarian follicle and CL growth profiles and synchrony of estrus and ovulation in CIDR-treated beef cows (n = 43). At random stages of the estrous cycle (Day 0), cows received a CIDR and no further treatment (Control), or an injection of 1, 2, or 5mg im of EV. On Day 7, CIDR were removed and cows received PGF. Follicular wave emergence occurred within 7 d in 7/10 Control cows and 31/32 EV-treated cows (P < 0.05). In responding cows, interval from treatment to FWE was longer (P < 0.05) in those treated with 5mg EV (4.8 ± 1.2 d) than in those treated with 1mg (3.2 ± 0.9 d) or 2mg (3.4 ± 0.8 d) EV, while Control cows were intermediate (3.8 ± 2.0 d). Diameter of the dominant follicle was smaller (P < 0.05) at CIDR removal and tended (P = 0.08) to be smaller just prior to ovulation in the 5mg EV group (8.5 ± 2.2 and 13.2 ± 0.6mm, respectively) than in the Control (11.8 ± 4.6 and 15.5 ± 2.9mm, respectively) or 1mg EV (11.7 ± 2.5 and 15.1 ± 2.2mm, respectively) groups, with the 2mg EV group (10.7 ± 1.5 and 14.3 ± 1.7mm, respectively) intermediate. Diameter of the dominant follicle at CIDR removal was less variable (P < 0.01) in the 2 and 5mg EV groups than in the Control group, and intermediate in the 1mg EV group. In summary, treatment with 5mg EV resulted in a longer and more variable interval to follicular wave emergence than treatment with 5mg estradiol-17β, which affected preovulatory dominant follicle size following progestin removal, and may have also affected superstimulatory response in Holstein cows. Additionally, 5mg EV appeared to induce luteolysis in heifers, reducing the interval to ovulation following norgestomet removal. Conversely, intervals to, and synchrony of, follicular wave emergence, estrus and ovulation following treatment with 1 or 2mg EV suggested that reduced doses of EV may be more useful for the synchronization of follicular wave emergence in progestogen-treated cattle.

Keywords: Estradiol valerate, Norgestomet, Cattle, Ovarian follicle dynamics, Superovulation

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0093-691X(04)00240-7

doi:10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.07.004

Theriogenology
Volume 63, Issue 5 , Pages 1454-1468, 15 March 2005