Tube feeding with a diabetes-specific feed for 12 weeks improves glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes patients☆☆☆
Summary
Background and aims
Assess longer-term (12 weeks) effects of a diabetes-specific feed on postprandial glucose response, glycaemic control (HbA1c), lipid profile, (pre)-albumin, clinical course and tolerance in diabetic patients.
Methods
In this randomized, controlled, double-blind, parallel group study 25 type 2 diabetic patients on tube feeding were included. Patients received a soy-protein based, multi-fibre diabetes-specific feed or isocaloric, fibre-containing standard feed for 12 weeks, while continuing on their anti-diabetic medication. At the beginning, after 6 and 12 weeks, several (glycaemic) parameters were assessed.
Results
The postprandial glucose response (iAUC) to the diabetes-specific feed was lower at the 1st assessment compared with the standard feed (p
=
0.008) and this difference did not change over time. HbA1c decreased over time in the diabetes-specific and not in the standard feed group (treatment*time:p
=
0.034): 6.9
±
0.3% (mean
±
SEM) at baseline vs. 6.2
±
0.4% at 12 weeks in the diabetes-specific group compared to 7.9
±
0.3% to 8.7
±
0.4% in the standard feed group. No significant treatment*time effect was found for fasting glucose, insulin, (pre-) albumin or lipid profile, except for increase of HDL in the diabetes-specific group.
Conclusions
The diabetes-specific feed studied significantly improved longer-term glycaemic control in diabetic patients. This was achieved in addition to on-going anti-diabetic medication and may affect clinical outcome.
Keywords: Tube feed, HbA1c, Type 2 diabetes, Long term study, Postprandial glucose, Diabetes-specific formula
Abbreviations: ALAT, alanine aminotransferase, ASAT, aspartate aminotransferase, BUN, blood urea nitrogen, GI, gastrointestinal, HbA1c, glycosylated hemoglobin, Hs-CRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, iAUC, incremental area under the curve, MUFA, monounsaturated fatty acids, NS, non-significant, (S)AE, (serious) adverse event, SEM, standard error of the mean, TG, triglycerides
To access this article, please choose from the options below
☆ This work has been presented at the ESPEN conference, 12-16 september 2008, Florence, Italy.
☆☆ ISRCTN57864852.
PII: S0261-5614(09)00102-2
doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2009.05.004
© 2009 Published by Elsevier Inc.
