Journal Home
Search for

Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages 55-58 (January 2004)


View previous. 11 of 19 View next.

Ethical implications of ethnic disparities in chronic kidney disease and kidney transplantation

Presented in part at The American Transplant Congress, Washington DC, June 2, 2003.

Ross IsaacsaCorresponding Author Informationemail address

Abstract 

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a major epidemic in underserved and minority populations largely due to excess rates of hypertensive and diabetic kidney disease. Multiple complex socioeconomic barriers to early diagnosis and optimal therapies as well as delayed referral for kidney transplantation have created disparities in CKD care provided to ethnic minorities. Disparities exist in wait list time and kidney transplant rates for Native Americans and blacks, independent of insurance status. Moreover, independent of genetic matching, long-term transplant outcomes in blacks remain significantly lower than all other ethnic groups, suggesting that poorly understood social factors contribute to these survival differences. The existence of these disparities raises ethical concerns of equity and social justice in terms of the allocation of scarce resources. Although current changes in allocation policies will improve some disparities, more efforts are ultimately needed to improve access to care and the overall health and survival for all individuals at risk for CKD, independent of their race, ethnicity, or socioeconomic status.

a Nephrology Division, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA

Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to Ross Isaacs, MD, Division of Nephrology, University of Virginia Health System, Box 800133, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA

PII: S1073-4449(03)00067-0

doi:10.1053/j.arrt.2003.10.008


View previous. 11 of 19 View next.