Volume 27, Issue 9 , Pages 547-553, November 2004
Dose Response for Chiropractic Care of Chronic Cervicogenic Headache and Associated Neck Pain: A Randomized Pilot Study
Objective
To acquire information for designing a large clinical trial and determining its feasibility and to make preliminary estimates of the relationship between headache outcomes and the number of visits to a chiropractor.
Design
Randomized, controlled trial.
Setting
Private practice in a college outpatient clinic and in the community.
Subjects
Twenty-four adults with chronic cervicogenic headache.
Methods
Patients were randomly allocated to 1, 3, or 4 visits per week for 3 weeks. All patients received high-velocity low-amplitude spinal manipulation. Doctor of Chiropractics could apply up to 2 physical modalities at each visit from among heat and soft tissue therapy. They could also recommend modification of daily activities and rehabilitative exercises. Outcomes included 100-point Modified Von Korff pain and disability scales, and headaches in last 4 weeks.
Results
Only 1 participant was insufficiently compliant with treatment (3 of 12 visits), and 1 patient was lost to follow-up. There was substantial benefit in pain relief for 9 and 12 treatments compared with 3 visits. At 4 weeks, the advantage was 13.8 (P = .135) for 3 visits per week and 18.7 (P = .041) for 4 visits per week. At the 12-week follow-up, the advantage was 19.4 (P = .035) for 3 visits per week and 18.1 (P = .048) for 4 visits per week.
Conclusion
A large clinical trial on the relationship between pain relief and the number of chiropractic treatments is feasible. Findings give preliminary support for the benefit of larger doses, 9 to 12 treatments, of chiropractic care for the treatment of cervicogenic headache.
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Funded by a grant from The Oregon Craniofacial Complementary and Alternative Medicine Center, National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine/National Institutes of Health (under P50 AT00076).
PII: S0161-4754(04)00239-8
doi:10.1016/j.jmpt.2004.10.007
© 2004 National University of Health Sciences. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 27, Issue 9 , Pages 547-553, November 2004
