Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 28, Issue 4 , Pages 259-264, May 2005

Treatment of Chronic Nonresponsive Patients With a Nonforce Technique

  • Ronald L. Rupert, MS, DC

      Affiliations

    • Director of Research, Parker College of Chiropractic, Research Institute, Dallas, Tex
    • Corresponding Author InformationSubmit requests for reprints to: Ronald L. Rupert, MS, DC, Director of Research, Parker College of Chiropractic, Research Institute, 2500 Walnut Hill Lane, Dallas, TX 75229
  • ,
  • Cheryl L. McKinzie, MS, MA

      Affiliations

    • Research Assistant, Parker College of Chiropractic, Research Institute, Dallas, Tex
  • ,
  • Milton T. Morter Jr, DC

      Affiliations

    • Private practice of chiropractic, Rogers, Ark
  • ,
  • Dwain M. Daniel, DC

      Affiliations

    • Chair, Department of Diagnosis, Parker College of Chiropractic, Research Institute, Dallas, Tex

Received 18 August 2003; received in revised form 22 December 2003

Sources of support: Supported by a grant from Morter Health Systems & Parker College of Chiropractic.

Objective

To investigate how chronic pain patients respond to treatment with Bio-Energetic Synchronization Technique (BEST).

Methods

Twenty-four adult patients with chronic pain-related conditions that failed to respond to previous chiropractic care were recruited. Subjects were given baseline assessments including pain Visual Analog Scale, Profile of Mood States, and the Global Well-being Scale. The 5-week treatment program consisted of an initial 3-day session with BEST therapy, followed by a single treatment session for the following 4 weeks. Patients were reevaluated at the end of the 3-day session and at weekly intervals throughout the course of care. At the end of week 5, patients were asked to assess their degree of satisfaction with the treatment.

Results

Patients had 3 main categories of pain: headache (n = 8, mean duration 15 years), neck pain (n = 18, mean duration 11 years), and low back pain (n = 17, mean duration 10 years). Global Well-Being Scale scores significantly improved at the end of the 3-day session (P > .05) but not subsequently. The Profile of Mood States reflected favorable changes in all areas. Significant improvement in vigor (P > .003) and fatigue (P > .006) existed at the end of 5 weeks (P < .01). The reduction of pain was significant at both the end of the 3-day session and at follow-up (P = .0003). A statistically significant decrease in depression (P = .004) was noted after 3 days, and a substantial although not significant (P = .06) decrease in depression existed at the end of 1 month. Eighty-two percent reported satisfaction with BEST (47% reported being “extremely satisfied” and 35% “satisfied”).

Conclusion

In this group of chronic pain patients, improvement in patient outcome measures was seen after 5 weeks of therapy. These patients also responded with a high degree of satisfaction with care.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0161-4754(05)00090-4

doi:10.1016/j.jmpt.2005.03.013

Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 28, Issue 4 , Pages 259-264, May 2005