American Journal of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopedics
Volume 124, Issue 6 , Pages 639-650, December 2003

Cephalometric evaluation of the craniofacial complex in patients treated with an intraoral distraction osteogenesis device: a preliminary report

  • Mary Trahar, DDS

      Affiliations

    • Washington, DC, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Mary Trahar, DDS, 4110 River Rd, NW, Washington, DC 20016, USA;
  • ,
  • Robert Sheffield, DDS

      Affiliations

    • Antioch, Calif, and lecturer, Section of Orthodontics, UCLA School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, Calif, USA
  • ,
  • Henry Kawamoto, DDS, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Plastic Surgery, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, Calif, USA
  • ,
  • Hao-Fu Lee, DDS, MS

      Affiliations

    • UCLA School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, Calif, USA
  • ,
  • Kang Ting, DMD, DMSc

      Affiliations

    • Section of Orthodontics, UCLA School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, Calif, USA

Abstract 

The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate cephalometrically the efficacy of an intraoral distraction osteogenesis device in treating patients with unilateral mandibular hypoplasia. Six patients with hemifacial microsomia underwent unilateral mandibular distraction. Posteroanterior and 45° lateral oblique cephalograms were measured, and changes in maxillary width and height, occlusal height, ramus height, mandibular length, and chin position were quantified. Measurements were taken preoperatively and postoperatively at 7 time points (T1-T7) over 2 years. Calculations for statistical significance were done to T6 for all patients and through T7 for 4 patients. The means and variances were calculated for the 6 cephalometric variables for each time point. The mean differences between treatment and control were calculated as well as analysis of variance. Mean differences between specific time periods were measured by pairwise comparison with significance determined at the 0.05 level of confidence. Statistical analysis was used for descriptive purposes only. The cephalometric data suggest that the intraoral distractor is as capable of lengthening hypoplastic mandibles as the initial extroral appliances. The bone lengthening appears stable, with the distracted side of the mandible maintaining a growth rate similar to the normal side. Immediately after distraction, transient improvements were noted in maxillary height, ramal height, and maxillary width. All patients demonstrated an immediate improvement in chin position toward the skeletal midline; however, after T4, menton appeared to be moving away from the midline over time.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This study was supported by a grant from the AAOF. From a thesis submitted by Dr Mary Trahar in partial fulfillment of the requirements for certificates in the specialties of orthodontics and pediatric dentistry.Submitted, October 2002; revised and accepted, April 2003.

PII: S0889-5406(03)00651-6

doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.04.002

American Journal of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopedics
Volume 124, Issue 6 , Pages 639-650, December 2003