Journal Home
Search for

Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages 584-588 (December 2005)


View previous. 19 of 34 View next.

Retinopathy of Prematurity: An Optimum Screening Strategy

Presented in part at the Royal College of Ophthalmologists meeting Manchester United Kingdom May 2004

Shu Fen Ho, MRCOphth (FRCS (Glasg))aCorresponding Author Informationemail address, M.R.K. Mathew, MRCOphth (FRCS (Glasg), FRCS (Edin))d, W. Wykes (FRCOphth)a, T. Lavy (FRCOphth)ab, T. Marshall, MScc

Received 4 January 2005; accepted 19 July 2005.

Objective: We sought to find out whether birth weight of less than1251 g or gestational age less than 30 weeks could provide a safe and efficient screening criteria of detecting treatable retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). Methods: Infants either with a birth weight less than 1500 g or gestational age less than 32 weeks were screened for ROP during an 8-year period. Results: In our study, the incidence of ROP was 36 of 187 (19.3%) infants. Although there was a slight increase in the number of infants screened over the years, the incidence of ROP of any stage remained stable. The maximum stage of ROP reached was stage 1 in 10 of187 (5.3%), stage 2 in 8 of 187 (4.3%), and stage 3 in 18 of 187 (9.6%) infants. Among those with stage 3 disease, threshold ROP was present in 16 of 18 (88.9%). All infants with threshold ROP had a BW less than 1100 g and gestational age less than or equal to 28 weeks. Significantly fewer babies (105/187, or 56%) would have been examined had inclusion criteria of a birth weight of less than 1251 g and gestational age less than30 weeks been applied. In addition, 31% (134/437) of screening examinations could have been avoided. Conclusions: Our study suggests that a birth weight of less than 1251 g and gestational age less than 30 weeks can be safely and efficiently used to screen infants without missing a diagnosis of sight-threatening ROP in our catchment population.

a Department of Ophthalmology, Southern General Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom

b Department of Ophthalmology, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Yorkhill, Glasgow, United Kingdom

c Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, the University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom

d Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, University of Nottingham, Queen Medical Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: S. F. Ho, Ophthalmology Department, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast BT12 6BA, Northern Ireland

PII: S1091-8531(05)00226-0

doi:10.1016/j.jaapos.2005.07.007


View previous. 19 of 34 View next.