Journal Home
Search for

Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages 44-48 (February 2006)


View previous. 9 of 164 View next.

Lions Clubs International Foundation Core Four Photoscreening: Results From 17 Programs and 400,000 Preschool Children

Sean P. Donahue, MD, PhDaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, John D. Baker, MDb, William E. Scott, MDc, Paul Rychwalski, MDd, Daniel E. Neely, MDe, Patrick Tong, MD, PhDf, Donald Bergsma, MDg, Deborah Lenahan, MDh, Dawn Rush, MDi, Ken Heinlein, PhDj, Ron Walkenbach, PhDk, Tammy M. Johnson, MPHl

Received 9 March 2005; accepted 15 August 2005.

Introduction: Photoscreening programs for preschool vision screening have been promoted by Lions Clubs International Foundation (LCIF) via their 17 Core Four grant project awards since 1999. Results from 15 Core Four grant programs in the United States and one in Taiwan are presented here. Methods: Photoscreening was modeled after the Tennessee program and instituted statewide in each area. Programs were given latitude with respect to screening instrument and referral criteria, but a partnering academic institution and medical director were expected. Preschool children were screened by volunteers; referred children were examined by community optometrists and ophthalmologists who returned results to each program’s coordinating center. Outcome data included number of children screened, referral rate, follow-up rate, and positive predictive value, which was generally determined using AAPOS-defined vision screening criteria. Results: All but one program used the MTI photoscreener (it chose not to participate); photoscreening referral criteria were standard for 13 programs. Through December 2004, more than 400,000 preschool children had been screened. The referral rate for programs using the MTI photoscreener averaged 5.2% (range, 3.7–12.6%). The predictive value of a positive photoscreen was 80%. Overall, 54% of referred children received follow-up examinations. Follow-up rate was the largest variable: 4 programs, screening nearly 250,000 children, had follow-up rates 70% or greater; 10 programs had follow-up data from fewer than 40% of referred children. Conclusions: Volunteer-led photoscreening programs can be instituted in other locations, including overseas, with high levels of effectiveness. Limitations include the possibility of poor success and variable attention to follow-up.

a Tennessee Lions’ Eye Center at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Departments of Ophthalmology, Pediatrics, and Neurology, Nashville, Tennessee

b Children’s Hospital of Michigan and Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan

c University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa

d University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky

e Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana

f Johns Hopkins/Wilmer Eye Institute, Baltimore, Maryland

g LSU, New Orleans, Louisiana

h St. Mary’s Hospital, Grand Junction, Colorado

i New York Medical College, Yorktown Heights, New York

j University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming

k Missouri Lions Eye Research Foundation, Columbia, Missouri

l Lions Clubs International Foundation, Chicago, Illinois

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Sean P. Donahue MD, PhD, Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, 1211 21st Avenue South, 104 Medical Arts Bldg, Nashville, TN 37212

 Supported by the Research to Prevent Blindness Career Development Award (SPD); Tennessee Lions Charities; Lions Clubs International Foundation; State of Tennessee; and Challenge Grant to Vanderbilt University from Research to Prevent Blindness.

This study was conducted at the Vanderbilt University Medical Center.

PII: S1091-8531(05)00236-3

doi:10.1016/j.jaapos.2005.08.007


View previous. 9 of 164 View next.