Journal Home
Search for

Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages 400-403 (October 2006)


View previous. 8 of 32 View next.

Effect of Adult Strabismus on Ratings of Official U.S. Army Photographs

Mitchell J. Goff, MDa, Abraham W. Suhr, MDac, John A. Ward, PhDa, Janis K. Croley, MDb, Mary A. O’Hara, MDacCorresponding Author Informationemail address

Received 16 September 2005; accepted 15 April 2006.

Purpose

To determine if strabismus affects the ratings of official U.S. Army photographs.

Methods

Photographs of seven women and seven men officers (subjects) were digitally altered to give the impression of strabismus. Four photographs of each subject were obtained: two in an orthotropic state; one in a left exotropic state; and one in a left esotropic state. The photographs were presented randomly to a panel of 38 raters. Masked to the study design, the raters rated every photograph on a 1 to 10 Likert scale. The results were grouped according to eye alignment: two orthotropic groups, one exotropic group, and one esotropic group. Comparisons of the mean ratings were made between each eye alignment group and based on the subject’s gender.

Results

The mean rating for each orthotropic group was 5.4 and 5.5 Likert scale units with a SD of 0.8 and 0.9, respectively (group 1 and group 2). The mean rating for the exotropic group was 5.4 Likert scale units with a SD of 0.7. The mean rating for the esotropic group was 5.1 Likert scale units with a SD of 0.8. Significantly lower ratings were obtained for the esotropic group compared with the orthotropic group (p=0.028). Women received significantly lower ratings regardless of eye alignment (p=0.044).

Conclusions

This study indicates that the presence of esotropia negatively affects the rating of an official U.S. Army photograph; furthermore, female gender negatively affects ratings.

a Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, Texas

b Darnall Army Community Hospital, Ft. Hood, Texas

c Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California.

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Mary O’Hara, MD, University of California, Davis Department of Ophthalmology, 4860 Y Street, Suite 2400, Sacramento, CA 95817

PII: S1091-8531(06)00444-7

doi:10.1016/j.jaapos.2006.04.011


View previous. 8 of 32 View next.