Pain Forum
Volume 8, Issue 4 , Pages 172-175, Winter 1999

Coping with pain:

What works, under what circumstances, and in what ways?

  • Jennifer A. Haythornthwaite

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Jennifer A. Haythornthwaite, PhD, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, 218 Meyer, 600 N. Wolfe St., Baltimore, MD 21287-7218.
  • ,
  • Leslie J. Heinberg

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland

Geissen Robinson, and Riley present a stimulating conceptual model of coping with chronic pain in which the authors argue that maladaptive beliefs and coping are primary determinants of adjustment and influence adaptive beliefs and coping through their influence on perceptions of control. We discuss some aspects of the model that require further refinement. First, the assessments of beliefs, appraisals, and coping need to be independent of outcome, obviating the use of “adaptive” and “maladaptive” in conceptual models. Unqualified statements about the universal adaptiveness, or maladaptiveness, of appraisal and coping strategies are likely to be unusual, since some strategies may result in higher emotional adjustment but not physical adjustment or vice versa. Second, beliefs, appraisals, and coping are distinct conceptual dimensions. Conceptual models that delineate relevant dimensions of these constructs rather than unify these partially independent constructs will likely have greater utility. Third, broadening the conceptualization of pain appraisal to include the individual's interpretation of the meaning of the pain is likely to provide expanded understanding of the pain coping process. Fourth, factors active in the individual's environment, particularly social relationships, need to be integrated into any comprehensive model of coping with chronic pain. And fifth, the bidirectional relationships between beliefs, appraisals, and coping need to be integrated into conceptual models. These processes are interrelated and feed back to one another as the individual struggles to cope with the challenges and threat posed by pain. The inherent complexity of coping with pain requires conceptualizations that address its transactional nature and methodologies that capture this dynamic process. Our comments direct future investigators to address when coping works, in what way it works, and for whom it works.

Key words: beliefs, appraisals, coping, catastrophizing, adjustment

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1082-3174(99)70003-6

doi:10.1016/S1082-3174(99)70003-6

Pain Forum
Volume 8, Issue 4 , Pages 172-175, Winter 1999