Pain Forum
Volume 8, Issue 4 , Pages 183-188, Winter 1999

The fallacy of using 50% pain relief as the standard for satisfactory pain treatment outcome

  • Joel L. Seres

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Joel L. Seres, MD, Northwest Occupational Medicine Center, 15862 SW 72nd Avenue, Portland, OR 97224.

Northwest Occupational Medicine Center, Portland, Oregon

Chronic pain treatment outcomes are difficult to standardize. Pain levels and improvement in pain often do not correlate with functional ability, need for medication, or suffering behaviors. The 50% threshold has become the standard for minimally adequate pain relief. In fact, there is little literature that supports such an outcome as meaningful. Because it is so easy to use, it has become in effect the “gold standard” of outcome. This review challenges its use as confusing and misleading and recommends its cessation. Current attempts at composite measures have promise.

Key words: chronic pain, outcomes, 50% relief, psychosocial factors, determining success

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1082-3174(99)70005-X

doi:10.1016/S1082-3174(99)70005-X

Pain Forum
Volume 8, Issue 4 , Pages 183-188, Winter 1999